Ghost (
hacktivist) wrote in
capeandcowl2012-05-08 03:32 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
◘ 16 ◘ voice;
It's telling to examine the similarities in emotional and computing vulnerabilities.
Many of the same security problems that existed in IPv4's implementation were not corrected in IPv6 (buffer overflows). One careless programmer can make a hundred thousand problems down the line with a brief lapse of attention (bounds checking). Constant vigilance and repeated testing of personal defenses are the only sure methods of safety.
And safety is a target in motion.
Generally speaking: how many times do you have to make the same mistake before you learn? Only once? Twice?
A hundred times?
Many of the same security problems that existed in IPv4's implementation were not corrected in IPv6 (buffer overflows). One careless programmer can make a hundred thousand problems down the line with a brief lapse of attention (bounds checking). Constant vigilance and repeated testing of personal defenses are the only sure methods of safety.
And safety is a target in motion.
Generally speaking: how many times do you have to make the same mistake before you learn? Only once? Twice?
A hundred times?
Voice; encrypted
If you want to talk.
Voice; encrypted
Voice; encrypted
Voice; encrypted
So I figured if trying to let people in was just going to get me burned, I wouldn't ever let anybody in. But that sucks so much. It's lonely and it still hurts you in the end, sometimes even worse than letting people in, in the first place. And sometimes taking a risk is so worth it, even if in the end... Even if there's an end.
Voice; encrypted
Gwen.
[How does he emotion at this, it's so hard.]
I have no doubt you behaved as best you could, given the dictates of circumstance.
Voice; encrypted
Voice; encrypted
Voice; encrypted