hacktivist: (and love is a word in the sand)
Ghost ([personal profile] hacktivist) wrote in [community profile] capeandcowl2012-08-08 09:46 pm

◘ text ◘ 18

sometimes i hate to be right

but so far

ENGLAND
ARGENTINA
NORWAY
RUSSIA
ITALY
GHANA
GERMANY
SAVOLETTA
(DOLVANIA)

if i were you i'd be canceling your travel plans (effective immediately)


[Encrypted to Maxine Gibson, unhackable]

your current status [?]

[Encrypted to Tony Stark and Magneto, unhackable]

last chance to abort
latveria: (.pondering)

[personal profile] latveria 2012-08-09 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
If you do not believe your own words, I question why you might think that anyone else would.

Moreover, there is the expression "to lead by example".
latveria: (.blue)

[personal profile] latveria 2012-08-09 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
Are you putting yourself on par with the ruler of a nation?
latveria: (.ominous sky)

[personal profile] latveria 2012-08-09 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
Which is influenced by any number of reactions and pre-dispositions. You were effected by Vulcanus's actions before, can you be assured that your sudden realization is not, at least in part, attributed to that?
latveria: (.leer)

[personal profile] latveria 2012-08-09 09:47 am (UTC)(link)
Doom believes that to be a fallacy. All people, regardless of their station, are influenced by events around them. To deny this is to fundamentally misunderstand the human subconscious and our very basic needs and impulses.
latveria: (.red magic)

[personal profile] latveria 2012-08-10 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
My claim, as you call it, is backed by years of evidence gathered by the psychiatric community. Your denial of influence does not change the fact that factors of your life have forced you to become the person you are today.

I have always considered living and sentient to be essentially the same for the discussion of psychology. Naturally I can understand where they differ scientifically. Or, are you asserting that because you are not living, you don't have the survival impulse present in most sentient creatures and thus, normal psychology would not apply to you?
latveria: (.gold)

[personal profile] latveria 2012-08-11 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
I am not invested. I simply find arguing against it illogical. No one is immune to the influence of others. We only possess freewill inasmuch as we can counter and channel those influences. To be influenced is not necessarily a bad thing. It the combination of those influences that lead us to our personalities and thought processes.

You disdain the psychiatric community. [It's a statement more than a question. But eh.]
latveria: (.crossed)

[personal profile] latveria 2012-08-11 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
No, I find your definition of free will to be flawed. Though my patience for your argumentativeness on this issue is quickly draining.

The girl who asked after you. She influences your choices and your actions. You have allowed her to become close to you, but you cannot deny that her concerns influence your own. Would you argue that?
latveria: (.ominous sky)

[personal profile] latveria 2012-08-11 05:47 am (UTC)(link)
You asserted that influences had nothing to do with your free will, I disagreed. Our definitions were implied by our positions in the argument, if never explicitly stated.

Influence is not purely emotional. It can dictate one's perspective and thus what they view as necessary. [Ignoring your Star Trek reference. DOOM HAS NO TIME FOR TV.]
latveria: (.leer)

[personal profile] latveria 2012-08-11 05:58 am (UTC)(link)
Taking action against Vulcanus with their current influence poses the dilemma of creating an international event. Surely such is a concern, but not one that should be handled by a paranoid mind.

You should reconsider presuming to advice me in the future, Ghost.
latveria: (.obstinate)

[personal profile] latveria 2012-08-11 06:01 am (UTC)(link)
It has proved to have scientific merit and use to me. I respect that.

As you wish. Pray that we should rarely cross paths, then.