[ the forty-sixth ] / [ voice ]
Apr. 10th, 2013 08:28 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Obviously we're a breed with many opinions on the vaguely illegal act of vigilantism. I say "vaguely illegal" because, as it stands, so many of our kind in particular are given leeway in this system -- and many of us are used to similar systems. Why? Because we see, so often, exceptional individuals changing oh so much to maintain the general status quo. You know what I refer to, surely: a man in a mask prevents a bank robbery, with minimal casualties. One clerk who otherwise would have died is merely shot in the face and vows revenge, calling himself Bankrupt or some such. Bankrupt shoots up an orphanage -- lives saved, lives stolen. Status quo maintained. So then, what's the point? What's the real thesis?
Is this country not a land of laws, rather than of merely men? Or should the exceptional lead by example, in action as well as words?
[A theatrical beat follows, and when he speaks it's not without a subtle tone of glee.]
Perhaps we should pause to consider the implication of moral relativity. I know some of you are well versed in relative morals.
Is this country not a land of laws, rather than of merely men? Or should the exceptional lead by example, in action as well as words?
[A theatrical beat follows, and when he speaks it's not without a subtle tone of glee.]
Perhaps we should pause to consider the implication of moral relativity. I know some of you are well versed in relative morals.